Thus in atchison topeka c r co v matthews supra the responsibility imposed upon railroad companies for attorneys fees in addition to damages was sustained page 238 u s 60 because designed to enforce care on the part of those companies to prevent the communication of fire and the destruction of property along their lines a duty . Us supreme court atchison topeka santa fe ry co v sowers 213 us 55 1909 atchison topeka santa fe railway company v sowers no 64 argued january 8 1909 decided march 1 1909 213 us 55 error to the court of civil appeals for the fourth supreme judicial district of the state of texas syllabus. Case opinion for nm court of appeals largo v atchison topeka and santa fe railway company read the courts full decision on findlaw the atchison topeka and santa fe railway company a delaware corporation and jp bigley defendants appellees california lawyers federal practice us supreme court modern practice . The state of arizona taxing authorities determined that additional transaction privilege taxes were due on southern pacific transportation companys activities within arizona after two unsuccessful administrative appeals southern pacific and the atchison topeka and santa fe railroad brought suit in district court. Brotherhood of locomotive engineers et al petitioners v atchison topeka and santa fe railroad company et al on writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the seventh circuit january 8 1996 justice kennedy delivered the opinion of the court congress enacted the hours of service act hsa in 1907
How it works:
1. Register Trial Account.
2. Download The Books as you like ( Personal use )